How much does “verified” actually mean?

[mr.fred.london]

• 
• 
• 

Hey everyone,

Just a question I’ve been wondering about… 

On RealEscort there are about 1000 profiles in total, but it looks like only around 200 are actually verified?

What’s interesting is that many of the unverified ones seem completely real — decent photos, consistent updates, good description, reviews, etc. And on the flip side, the verified ones can honestly feel a bit "to good" to me.

How much weight do you guys actually put on the “verified” badge? Can i trust it? Is there some "types" of the verified that I should avoid or special signs I should look for?

Would love to hear what others think 

[Optimum2]

Nothing....as a rule

[nelson2]

42 minutter siden, Optimum2 skrev:

Nothing....as a rule

Agree.

[Idioten]

"Verified" by RE is mostly irrelevant like the others have said. I know girls that have real photos and are verified, but there's been several stories of girls that have had their ad verified and later changed photos or swapped the girl in the ad. "Trial" is more meaningful. Those are new ads and more risky than average. Then again... if you're hunting for "new gold" this is where you gotta go

Always search for the girl on this forum before visiting. That is the closest to actually verified you're gonna get.

Also, read this:

 

[mr.fred.london]

Thanks for the replies guys!

@Idioten Ah okay, that makes sense and could explain it a bit. Trial is good to know, wasn’t sure if it was a special type of ad, but they are just new. So trial + verified could be somewhat safe?

I saw this girl mentioned in another post, she seems completely real, other guys talk about her and she has good reviews. Weird that she’s not verified.

https://www.realescort.eu/ads/185678/alaria

[Chen]

2 timer siden, mr.fred.london skrev:

Thanks for the replies guys!

@Idioten Ah okay, that makes sense and could explain it a bit. Trial is good to know, wasn’t sure if it was a special type of ad, but they are just new. So trial + verified could be somewhat safe?

I saw this girl mentioned in another post, she seems completely real, other guys talk about her and she has good reviews. Weird that she’s not verified.

https://www.realescort.eu/ads/185678/alaria

As for Alaria, she had some trouble with her old ad and had to make a new. As long as she has a stable clientell, and her reviews here on the forum is good, there is no rush to get verified. 

[mr.fred.london]

På 23.5.2025 den 22.18, Chen skrev:

As for Alaria, she had some trouble with her old ad and had to make a new. As long as she has a stable clientell, and her reviews here on the forum is good, there is no rush to get verified. 

Makes sense. She’s super cute though, will see if I can get a “date” with her! 

[Idioten]

På 23.5.2025 den 20.04, mr.fred.london skrev:

So trial + verified could be somewhat safe?

Trial is never safe, but it is new. Other than that you can safely ignore badges given by RE.

På 23.5.2025 den 20.04, mr.fred.london skrev:

I saw this girl mentioned in another post, she seems completely real, other guys talk about her and she has good reviews. Weird that she’s not verified.

"Verified" by RE is in no way connected to good reviews or anything said on the forum. It's a process where the girls send photos to RE to verify they are the one in the ad. Some are real. Most of them I would guess.

I'll repeat myself:

På 22.5.2025 den 19.31, Idioten skrev:

Always search for the girl on this forum before visiting. That is the closest to actually verified you're gonna get.

I will personally vouch for Alaria without ever having met her. She has been on "Ukas sexy" for like a year running now and has been mentioned countless times on the forum by content visitors. You can safely visit her knowing it is the girl in the photos and she does deliver on what is promised. Getting access to this kind of knowledge is why we're on this forum

[Chen]

16 minutter siden, Idioten skrev:

Getting access to this kind of knowledge is why we're on this forum

Amen!